Try Nettle™ Risk-Free with 90 Day Returns.
Samphire ROI Calculator
ROI Calculator

The True Cost of Reproductive & Hormonal Health in Your Workforce

Menstrual health, perimenopause, menopause, endometriosis, PMDD, and PCOS cost employers billions in lost productivity and avoidable surgeries. See how much you could save with Samphire.

Your Workforce

500
50%
$55,000
Population Segments
Menstrual Health (Reproductive-Age)
Perimenopause & Menopause
Condition Prevalence (% of Repro-Age)
Condition Incremental Impact (Addl Days)
Surgery Rates & Costs
Turnover
Samphire Effectiveness
Program Pricing
Your workforce loses an estimated
$661,723
per year to reproductive & hormonal health-related productivity loss
Menstrual Health
$349,489
188 reproductive-age
Peri & Menopause
$59,892
63 peri/menopausal
Endo, PMDD & PCOS
$49,302
incremental burden
Surgery & Recovery
$79,291
5.4 procedures/yr
Turnover
$123,750
5 departures
With Samphire, you could save an estimated
$186,173
per year, including avoided surgeries and recovery time
5.9x
return on every dollar invested in Samphire

Estimated annual program cost: $31,500

Based on 30 enrolled employees at $1,050/employee

$619
net savings per affected employee per year

Savings Breakdown by Category

CategoryAnnual CostSavings
Menstrual health productivity$349,489$111,836
Perimenopause & menopause$59,892$14,973
Endometriosis (incremental)$23,322$6,997
PMDD (incremental)$13,089$3,927
PCOS (incremental)$12,891$3,867
Surgery & recoveryavoided$79,291$19,823
Turnover$123,750$24,750

Cost per Employee in Context

Samphire
$900–$1,200
Typical EAP
~$35/yr
Avg Health Spend
$16,500/yr

EAP: 3–5% utilization typical. Employer health spend per KFF 2024.

Want a personalised report?

Get a detailed PDF breakdown tailored to your workforce.

QR code to book a demo

Scan to book a demo

or click here

Sources

  • Schoep ME, et al. (2019). "Productivity loss due to menstruation-related symptoms." BMJ Open. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026186
  • Ponzo S, et al. (2022). "Menstrual cycle-associated symptoms and workplace productivity in US employees." Digital Health. DOI: 10.1177/20552076221145852
  • Nnoaham KE, et al. (2011). "Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity." Fertility and Sterility. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090
  • Fourquet J, et al. (2010). "Patients' report on how endometriosis affects health, work, and daily life." Fertility and Sterility. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.017
  • Simoens S, et al. (2012). "The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life." Human Reproduction Update. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms029
  • Halbreich U, et al. (2003). "The prevalence, impairment, impact, and burden of premenstrual dysphoric disorder." Psychoneuroendocrinology. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00098-2
  • Bozdag G, et al. (2016). "The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome." Human Reproduction Update. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew218
  • CIPD (2023). Menopause in the Workplace. Survey Report.
  • Fawcett Society (2022). Menopause and the Workplace.
  • SHRM (2022). Average Cost-per-Hire for Companies.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics — annual turnover rates.
  • KFF (2024). Employer Health Benefits Survey.

Calculation Methodology

The calculator models six cost categories across four population segments:

Menstrual health costs (absenteeism + presenteeism) apply to reproductive-age female employees based on Schoep et al. and Ponzo et al.

Perimenopause & menopause costs apply to the peri/menopausal segment using CIPD and Fawcett Society data on symptom-related absenteeism, presenteeism, and brain fog productivity loss.

Condition-specific incremental costs capture the additional productivity burden for employees with endometriosis, PMDD, and PCOS beyond the population-level averages.

Surgery & recovery costs model the employer burden of condition-related surgeries including recovery time off and direct employer costs.

Turnover costs estimate departures attributable to inadequate reproductive health support across all female employees.

Disclaimer: This calculator provides estimates based on published research. Actual results will vary based on your workforce demographics, industry, and implementation. Samphire effectiveness estimates are based on conservative projections. Condition prevalence rates represent population averages; overlap between conditions means actual affected headcount may be lower than the sum of individual estimates. All figures are in USD.